Why don’t they go inside and make contact while they read to these A woman cannot survive on reading alone she also needs a dachshund shirt, human contact is more important than reading to them. Why are the dogs behind the glass? Or the readers outside of it? They need to be snuggling w/ the dogs…physical contact is so much more important!
A woman cannot survive on reading alone she also needs a dachshund shirt, tank top, youth tee and ladies tee
The end of the A woman cannot survive on reading alone she also needs a dachshund shirt. Here’s an idea for #7: this is all about IQ test results, rather than the abstract concept of intelligence. IQ testing was developed to correlate with our perception of people’s intelligence, but it is just an approximation. Every kind of IQ test simplifies the measurement of a very complex concept to a few simple metrics of logic or math or spatial skills or reaction time, etc. Possibly the nature of intelligence changed and the Norwegian military is using the same test as 50 years ago. Possibly intelligence takes different forms now than 50 years ago.
A woman cannot survive on reading alone she also needs a dachshund shirt, hoodie, sweater and long sleeve
After all basic math skills or attention to detail or many other traits that are easy to measure in those tests have less evolutionary advantage now than they had before the age of computers and the internet. So my point is that IQ scores may be on the decline if measured by tools from the 1970’s, but we must also ask ourselves whether we are using the right tools to measure. I would not be surprised to see new IQ tests being developed in response to this. Just my 2 cents. Actually thanks for this comment. I am aware of the limits for IQ tests, and the huge debates in the 70 and 80 around it. What is IQ? What actually IQ tests measure? What about cultural sensitivity (the different results between white and Afro-Americans soon. .And that in the end, the community agreed that it does not really measure IQ, but, maybe a general cognitive predisposition. However, since then, it is still used. That, indeed, it might be also time/generation sensitive, it might be the case. Anyhow, even with a new IQ test developed, I am not so sure what it will come out on a longitudinal study… unless it is developed as in the ’70s, on white middle-class Americans… but, it might also be the case, that a new IQ test is not developed, unless there is a common agreement on what IQ is actually?